by Dr Loïse Jeannin
In this
post, I want to share with you why I was so excited to read this book. It
focuses on teachers’ reflective practice and inclusive pedagogies by drawing on
key theories (Dewey, Schön, Brookfield) and developing practical recommendations
for school teachers.
Let me first tell you why I wanted to read it.
Having taught in Thailand in an international university with students coming from
92 different nationalities, I have developed a strong interest in inclusive
teaching. I indeed quickly realised that my French
way of teaching was not adequate to engage culturally diverse students,
who—for a standard classroom of 35 students, came from 10 different countries (with
a majority of Thai students). I encountered diverse learning styles, different
teacher-student interaction modes, and different habits in terms of individual/group
work, etc.
That’s how my doctoral journey on the
professional development of university lecturers truly started. I had first to
be exposed to students’ cultural diversity to be able to reflect on my ability
to serve their learning needs and to finally reconsider my teaching philosophy, the course content and the assessment modalities. As I was teaching
economics and management at the time, I decided to draw more often on
Thai/Asian case studies and to use a larger spectrum of assignments (from
individual to group assignments).
This “pedagogical culture shock” forced me
to grow, and as I wanted to learn more, I decided to further my knowledge
through a doctoral study on lecturers’ professional development needs in this
multicultural setting.
So, I was hoping that reading this book
would further my knowledge on teachers’ reflective practice and inclusive
teaching. Hence, in the following, I summarise its content before sharing some critical
thoughts.
1. Book
Summary
The first part of the book looks at how
primary and secondary school teachers can become more reflective in various
contexts (South Africa, Qatar, the United States), while the second part
presents strategies to develop inclusive teachers, for different ethnic groups
but also for children with special learning needs. This second section also includes
examples from different countries (Greece, United Arab Emirates, Hong-Kong,
Malaysia).
So, the question I asked myself was: How do
we connect reflective practice to inclusive pedagogical practices?
Let’s start with the theoretical backgrounds
that underlie the chapters. The art of reflective practice is anchored in the
works of Schön (1983) and Brookfield (1995). Teachers are expected to be
reflective in (=during), on (=after), and for (=planning) practice. In fact, three kinds of
assumptions can influence teachers’ interpretation of the reality: paradigmatic, prescriptive and causal assumptions. The first one is a taken-for-granted
assumption about what is true, the second one concerns prescription about what should be, and the last one pertains to logical
relationships that are expected between different phenomena.
Other conceptual constructs were
interestingly mobilised in the book, such as reflective scepticism that supports transformative learning
(Mezirow, 1990), imaginative speculation
to imagine different ways of thinking and teaching, and contextual awareness when teachers acknowledge that their
taken-for-granted assumptions are socially and personally constructed.
Through a critical analysis of their
assumptions, teachers are encouraged to depart from a deficiency/deficit analysis of the learning abilities of their
culturally diverse students (Milner, 2010) to be able to better support their
learning process. Hence, the book suggests to support teachers’ reflective practices
through the use of different tools, that I organized around individual and
collective activities (Table 1).
Individual Reflection
|
Peer-Group Reflection
|
Journal/Blog
writing
|
JoHari window*
|
Action
research: experimentation-reflection-introspection
|
Participative action research
|
Formative
portfolio
|
Observation and advice from
school principals
|
Videotaping
|
Communities of reflective practice:
face-to-face or online, with teachers, school professionals and academics
working together
|
Table 1. Reflective activities presented in the
book.
*JoHari Window: a group activity where one
teacher review his/her main teaching qualities/personal attributes with the
help of peers.
Then, several good practices were presented in the book to develop teachers’
inclusive pedagogy, for learners from different cultural backgrounds or for children
with special learning needs/learning impairments. These pedagogical activities
can be implemented in the class or outside (Table 2).
In-class
|
Outside the class
|
Differentiated
instruction
|
Community & family engagement
|
Culturally responsive teaching
(Ladson-Billing, 1995; Gay, 2010)
|
Appreciative
inquiry*: Map of community assets
|
Table 2. Actions to develop inclusive pedagogies
*Appreciative inquiry is a method to list
and praise the resources that can be mobilised to undertake changes and promote
learning.
The general argument of the book is that reflective teachers are better prepared
for diverse classrooms because they learn every day by reflecting on what works
and what does not, and by wondering regularly how is each of their learners
doing in terms of school performance, taking into account cultural preferences
and community resources for learning (see Chap. 10 & 18). But the book does
not assume that some teachers are
reflective by nature while others are
not. It suggests strategies to support teachers on the path of reflection and
inclusiveness. For example, in Chap. 11, the author recommended to combine two
approaches to prepare culturally foreign teachers who start teaching in a new
context. First, they advised to provide specific contextual information about students’
cultural preferences, without falling into stereotyping and over-generalisation.
The author argued that culture cannot be narrowed to an unique “list of
traits”, it is moving with the changes impacting societies and countries (economic
changes, international flows); however, providing newcomers with some contextual
information is recommended. The second approach is to encourage teachers to be
open-minded and curious towards differences, to value and respect them in
class. It may require adjustments in terms of student-teacher communication practices.
This second approach is less context-specific but encourages teachers and
students to adopt an inclusive mindset.
Finally, the role of school leaders is strongly emphasized throughout the book (see
Chap. 7), as they play a crucial role in supporting teachers’ reflection and
pedagogical innovation, like implementing new technologies for children with
visual or hearing impairments (Chap. 13). If teachers feel supported by their
school leader, through encouraging discourses and professional development
programs, they will be more prone to technological innovation that supports
children’s inclusion and collaboration.
2. Critical
thoughts
The chapters are unequal in terms of
quality, some are well-written while others are undermined by recurring typos
and inadequate affirmations. The relationship between reflective and inclusive
practices is not always clarified, but important questions are debated
which makes this book interesting for school teachers and leaders working in
culturally diverse environments. For example, Chap. 14 and 15 are excellent in
showing the relationship between reflection
and inclusive practices using
different channels: perception changes
of who are the students/ their needs/ their abilities and resources, and the
development of teachers’ resilience when
facing difficult teaching situations.
I found this book rich in ideas for reflective activities which can be useful for
academic developers/trainers. For example, the community of reflective practice
presented in Chap. 15 showed how it provided teachers with a safe space for
learning and sharing, under professional guidance. As a result of these
reflective meetings, teachers reported having become less critical toward
parents and students considered ‘problematic’,
they learned to manage their own anxieties and got a more thorough and holistic
understanding of the child’s context. Hence, Chap. 15 is an interesting chapter that shows how awareness, resilience and inclusiveness
are intrinsically linked. When teachers are emotionally resilient, and can
reflect and collaborate on creative ideas, they can derive solutions to support
students’ at risk.
Finally, as expounded in the book (Chap.
1), 21st century teachers are expected to “teach” new skills beyond the 3Rs (reading, writing, arithmetic); they
must develop learners’ critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and
creativity skills to enable them to meet the challenges of fast-changing
environments.
Figure 1. Shift in learning objectives
This shift in the teaching objectives
enables me to conclude this critical review. The book can truly help teachers
and school leaders to get prepared for the 21st century, by adopting
a reflective stance and developing inclusive teaching practices to promote
social justice and children’s equality. However, these new skills (critical
thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity) must firstly be
developed by teachers (under the encouragement of their school principals)
before expecting them to design learning activities that will support the
development of their learners’ skills.
Book published in 2017, by Routledge
Editors: Ismail Hussein Amzat & Nena Padilla-Valdez
About Loïse Jeannin
Loïse is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Johannesburg. Her topics of interest are inclusive education and professional development programs for university lecturers. She has taught in universities in France and Thailand and has published several research articles in peer-reviewed journals.
No comments:
Post a Comment