Amasa Ndofirepi, University of Johannesburg |
In pursuit of the foregoing, is this what
recent student protests in South African universities meant when, in their Fees
must fall campaign, they referred to “a lack of African content in the curriculum?” Could it
be one way of speaking out against exclusionary, elite-dominated university
curriculum policy makers bent to eliminate the majority from the theatre of recognition
of other knowledge producers? Although some may argue that students are
following blindly the politics of knowledge, dos Santos, (2004) would
defend their actions as "resistance against hegemonic globalisation” which
place western scientistic knowledge forms and sources on pole positions in the
hierarchical knowledge pyramid. This view endorses the presence of what dos
Santos refers to as the “monocultures of
knowledge" (ibid). But are there some (K)nowledges
that reign supreme above other (k)nowledges? Yet another pedestrian question
could be: do university students know what they are supposed to learn and know
ahead of their lecturers as the former attempt to separate the different
forms and sources of knowledge? All these epistemological questions, I argue, revolve
around the politics of knowledge and the puzzle of whose knowledge matters in
the African university in the 21st century. I find the readings of dos Santos’
works appropriate to the debates
revolving around the decolonisation of knowledges in the African university as
long as proponents are constantly reminding themselves that Africa, as a
continent and the institutions therein, are circumscribed by the global
knowledge economy which is difficult to resist and shake off in the 21st
century.
No comments:
Post a Comment